Unfortunately, they seem to want to pick a narrow list of viable archetypes and manipulate the META to a fine degree. Have you noticed that in spite of some extremely broken cards in recent sets, almost none of them actually make it into top 20 deck archetypes anymore? We don't see Standard bans and refunds anymore, because they squash them using the matchmaking algorithm! □ I mean, decks with a lifetime win rate over 32 matches of 70%+, turning so dramatically to the downside that they've had lifetime win rates driven into the mid 20s before I've finally had enough of the absurdity. I've had mono green standard decks go something like 30-8, only to then go 2-24. content on this page is ©2023 and may not be used or reproduced without consent. User Decks Deck Writeups Deck Builder My Decks. Only includes decks with high win rates Decks. The companion mechanic warped nearly every format and required an emergency errata, which wasnt printed on the cards. But sandbagging those digital features also hobbles MTG's ability to fend off market competitors in the digital market. Something like 10+ mechanically unique cards were banned in Standard at the same time due to power creep and lazy testing. If they really fleshed out Arena, gave it multiplayer Commander support and full-card-pool Modern/Legacy/Pioneer, it would legitimately start the death spiral for paper product. Best analysis of the current Traditional Standard meta. The 2019-2020 constructed environment was an absolute shitshow. However, the game's algorithms will eventually solve it. The Latest Traditional Standard top performing deck lists. Maybe once a month, I will tune a mono green deck to achieve an insane win rate, often 70%+ over the first three dozen matches. Or, is it just some quirk of the way the algorithm has trained itself, and something they are having trouble "correcting"? The only question left for me is, have they intentionally decided to kill mono green in the current standard meta? (Only Golgari gets worse matchups consistently). I honestly think it's almost entirely the matchmaking algorithm to blame, not that the design team has been an utter failure at keeping green playable. I advise no one to use this game until they fix things. Im a bronze 4 and I went up vs 2 golds and whatever the hll a red ranked is. I don't even know how you fck up that bad at matchmaking. Did another 3 rounds, the matchmaking is utter dogsit. Adding a 2023 Standard queue could freshen up Standard, which will become a little staler than usual without a Summer set release.1 Skysovereign, Consul Flagship (KLR) 272 1.png 508 KB Arch5746528 commented Ap18:23 Report Wanted to do some science. Standard will be a completely different game without meta-shaping cards like Goldspan Dragon, Expressive Iteration, Esika's Chariot, Runeforge Champion, etc. To me, at least, it was a really fun experience. Midweek Magic this week gave us a taste of new preconstructed decks from post-rotation Standard. An Alchemy 2023 queue could also include the upcoming Baldur's Gate expansion (releases July 7). The main difference this time around is that there isn't going to be a Standard 2023 set this summer, so the only sets in the queue would be both Innistrad sets, Kamigawa, and Capenna. Follow the protagonist as he wades through all kinds of adventures and hijinks with a supporting cast of some of the cutest and most interesting creatures in this magical universe, mere moments before they all get turned. The last few years, Arena introduced a Standard play queue in July that only allowed decks that would be Standard legal after the upcoming Fall rotation. Why Standard Sucks and How to Prevent It takes a slightly darker tone than the original, but is still full of the same charm.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |